Whites have committed atrocities too, when they are governed by dictatorships. Blacks lack the organizational skills of whites and Orientals, so black run countries have not emulated the mass murder of Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, and several Communist countries. Nevertheless, whites and Orientals are much safer to live with and near than blacks. Countries run by whites and Orientals have much lower crime rates than black run countries. That is the difference I draw attention to, and one I believe is genetically caused, like low average black IQ's.

By your definition a bigot is one who knows that it is wise to take precautions with young black men one does not know that are unnecessary with young white and Oriental men. By your definition Jesse Jackson is a bigot.

 

Another unanswer from the resident bigot.

Your "facts" are not supportable.

 

Which of my facts cannot be supported?

My answer appears to have been over your head. Here are some more facts for you to ignore.

Wall Street Journal opinion, by Jason Riley, June 9, 2020

So long as blacks are committing more than half of all murders and robberies while making up only 13% of the population, and so long as almost all of their victims are their neighbors, these communities will draw the lion’s share of police attention. Defunding the police, or making it easier to prosecute officers, will only result in more lives lost in those neighborhoods that most need protecting.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-full-truth-about-race-and-policing-11591744223

Jason Riley appears to be black. It is unfortunate that most whites are afraid to draw attention to the problem of black crime in the United States.

 

We been over this before.
Classifications of race are almost always done based on physical appearance by law enforcement personnel completing arrest, booking, and court records.
These assessments, as you well know, are unreliable.

Classifications of race done for college entrance, skills assessment tests, IQ tests and similar tests are most often self assessments.

A vital part of any "scientific" exercise is the need to verify any data and determine an error factor. Where data is compared from different sources (court records and college graduation records for example) it is critical that collection criteria be the same or differences accounted for.

Classification of race by laymen is hardly scientific, cannot be verified, and, based on your own performance with "what race am I" tests, notoriously error prone.

 

MAGA fucks suck. Change my mind.

MAGA Convoy Stirs Online Outrage for Shutting Down NJ’s Garden State Parkway

https://www.mediaite.com/election-2...e-for-shutting-down-njs-garden-state-parkway/

 

"The Inequality Taboo," by Charles Murray, Commentary, September 2005

The Harvard geneticist Richard Lewontin originated the idea of race as a social construct in 1972, arguing that the genetic differences across races were so trivial that no scientist working exclusively with genetic data would sort people into blacks, whites, or Asians. In his words, "racial classification is now seen to be of virtually no genetic or taxonomic significance." Lewontin's position, which quickly became a tenet of political correctness, carried with it a potential means of being falsified. If he was correct, then a statistical analysis of genetic markers would not produce clusters corresponding to common racial labels.

In the last few years, that test has become feasible, and now we know that Lewontin was wrong. Several analyses have confirmed the genetic reality of group identities going under the label of race or ethnicity. In the most recent, published this year, all but five of the 3,636 subjects fell into the cluster of genetic markers corresponding to their self identified ethnic group. When a statistical procedure, blind to physical characteristics and working exclusively with genetic information, classifies 99.9 percent of the individuals in a large sample in the same way they classify themselves, it is hard to argue that race is imaginary.

*not_secure_link*www.iapsych.com/wj3ewok/LinkedDocuments/Murray2005.pdf

-------

Putting this in my own words, I will repeat what I have said previously: a person's race can usually be determined by appearance; it can always by DNA analysis. Once you know a person's race you can make reasonable assumptions about the person's intelligence, criminal record, and whether or not the person has had illegitimate children, and if so, how many. Stereotypes are over generalizations of what is really true. There is no stereotype of the fat Chinese woman on welfare with five illegitimate children by five different men. People do not worry about being mugged by Jews.

Unfortunately, it has become fashionable to deny in public what most of us privately know to be true. Race is a subject where the more one ignores the findings of science the more enlightened one is said to be.

 

Race is a subject where the more one ignores the findings of science the more enlightened one is said to be.
​

Ah. So the reason you continue to deny the unscientific nature of your "facts" is because you think it makes you enlightened?

 

Hey @shootersa is it alright for Trump supporters to block off highways?

 

What is unscientific about my factual assertions?

 

Your "facts" are not verifiable or repeatable. They are not scientific. You already know this, but refuse to confront it.

- shootersa

----------

This experiment is certainly repeatable:

"The Harvard geneticist Richard Lewontin originated the idea of race as a social construct in 1972, arguing that the genetic differences across races were so trivial that no scientist working exclusively with genetic data would sort people into blacks, whites, or Asians. In his words, "racial classification is now seen to be of virtually no genetic or taxonomic significance." Lewontin's position, which quickly became a tenet of political correctness, carried with it a potential means of being falsified. If he was correct, then a statistical analysis of genetic markers would not produce clusters corresponding to common racial labels.

"In the last few years, that test has become feasible, and now we know that Lewontin was wrong. Several analyses have confirmed the genetic reality of group identities going under the label of race or ethnicity. In the most recent, published this year, all but five of the 3,636 subjects fell into the cluster of genetic markers corresponding to their self identified ethnic group. When a statistical procedure, blind to physical characteristics and working exclusively with genetic information, classifies 99.9 percent of the individuals in a large sample in the same way they classify themselves, it is hard to argue that race is imaginary."
*not_secure_link*www.iapsych.com/wj3ewok/LinkedDocuments/Murray2005.pdf

This experiment could be done again and again with much larger population samples. Instead of relying on self identification experimenters could get 10,000 white Europeans, 10,000 Chinese and Japanese, and 10,000 African Negroes. I am confident the results would be the same. If a few individuals were of mixed race, DNA testing would verify that too.

 

7-1.

Supreme Court throws out First Amendment ruling against Black Lives Matter activist DeRay Mckesson

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-throws-out-case-against-activist/5888878002/

 

Murray and Hermstein have been so discredited so many times Shooter wouldn't believe anything they offered.
What else you got?
You know, reliable.

- shootersa

Murray and Herrnstein would be discredited by one, two, or all of three findings. First, it would be found that an IQ test given to a seven year old child does not predict academic and economic success with a fair degree of accuracy. Second, a method would be found of significantly and permanently improving the academic and economic performance of poor children who test poorly when they are seven years old. Third, blacks would come to perform as well on the average as whites academically and economically without grade inflation and without affirmative action.

The Bell Curve was published twenty six years ago. I am still waiting.

Shouting "Racist!" at Murray, Herrnstein, and me does not discredit us. It proves that we cannot be refuted, and that those who wish desperately that we are mistaken (although they privately agree with us) are restricted to the lowest form of discourse: name calling.

 

N.J. Cops Weigh Charges in ‘Irresponsible’ Trump Caravan Traffic Jam

https://www.thedailybeast.com/new-j...esponsible-trump-caravan-traffic-jam?ref=home

 

Tonight BLM will be out in droves.